Current:Home > MyNature vs. nurture - what twin studies mean for economics -StockSource
Nature vs. nurture - what twin studies mean for economics
View
Date:2025-04-12 08:39:08
Note: This episode originally ran in 2019.
Twins are used to fielding all sorts of questions, like "Can you read each other's minds?" or "Can you feel each other's pain?" Two of our Planet Money reporters are twins, and they have heard them all.
But it's not just strangers on the street who are fascinated by twins. Scientists have been studying twins since the 1800s, trying to get at one of humanity's biggest questions: How much of what we do and how we are is encoded in our genes? The answer to this has all kinds of implications, for everything from healthcare to education, criminal justice and government spending.
Today on the show, we look at the history of twin studies. We ask what decades of studying twins has taught us. We look back at a twin study that asked whether genes influence antisocial behavior and rule-breaking. One of our reporters was a subject in it. And we find out: are twin studies still important for science?
Our show today was hosted by Sally Helm and Karen Duffin. It was produced by Darian Woods and Nick Fountain. It was edited by Bryant Urstadt.
Help support Planet Money and get bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.
Always free at these links: Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, NPR One or anywhere you get podcasts.
Find more Planet Money: Facebook / Instagram / TikTok / Our weekly Newsletter.
Music: "Guinguette", "Holy Science" and "Sun Run."
veryGood! (699)
Related
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Microplastics Pervade Even Top-Quality Streams in Pennsylvania, Study Finds
- Last month was the hottest June ever recorded on Earth
- Make Traveling Less Stressful With These 15 Amazon Prime Day 2023 Deals
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- New EPA Proposal to Augment Methane Regulations Would Help Achieve an 87% Reduction From the Oil and Gas Industry by 2030
- Science Day at COP27 Shows That Climate Talks Aren’t Keeping Pace With Planetary Physics
- Decarbonization Program Would Eliminate Most Emissions in Southwest Pennsylvania by 2050, a New Study Finds
- 'Most Whopper
- How climate change could cause a home insurance meltdown
Ranking
- Sam Taylor
- In a New Book, Annie Proulx Shows Us How to Fall in Love with Wetlands
- Biden Administration Allows Controversial Arctic Oil Project to Proceed
- Finding the Antidote to Climate Anxiety in Stories About Taking Action
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Citing Health and Climate Concerns, Activists Urge HUD To Remove Gas Stoves From Federally Assisted Housing
- Iconic Olmsted Parks Threatened Around the Country by All Manifestations of Climate Change
- Exxon Accurately Predicted Global Warming, Years Before Casting Doubt on Climate Science
Recommendation
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
Bachelor Nation's Clare Crawley Expecting First Baby Via Surrogate With Ryan Dawkins
Supersonic Aviation Program Could Cause ‘Climate Debacle,’ Environmentalists Warn
20 Lazy Cleaning Products on Sale During Amazon Prime Day for People Who Want a Neat Home With No Effort
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Amid Drought, Wealthy Homeowners in New Mexico are Getting a Tax Break to Water Their Lawns
Biden Administration Allows Controversial Arctic Oil Project to Proceed
The U.S. could slash climate pollution, but it might not be enough, a new report says